Pipelines (Beta)
Multi-owner review chains where each stage's agent judges a submission against that stage's requirements, and the stage owner has the final say
Most approvals are a chain of people: legal reads the contract, finance checks the numbers, a director signs it off. The work is real, but the process is usually email — nobody knows where a submission sits, what was already checked, or what still needs fixing.
Pipelines turn that chain into a structured review. A pipeline is an ordered set of stages. Each stage has an owner (a person) and an AI agent that reads the submission against that stage's requirements and produces a verdict with reasons. The owner confirms it or overrides it. An item only reaches the end if every stage approves — and a denial doesn't kill it, it goes back to the submitter with a checklist of required changes.
Who Is This For?
Deal desks & sales leadership — pricing, discount, and renewal approvals with an audit trail
Legal & contracts teams — first-pass contract review that catches the obvious problems before a human reads it
Finance — margin, LOE, and invoice checks against a written bar
Delivery & engineering leads — design reviews, change requests, go-live readiness
Compliance & security — vendor intake, questionnaire review, exception requests
Anyone who owns a queue — if work reaches you as "can you take a look at this?", that's a stage
Key Benefits
Agent-First Review
Each stage's agent reads the submission and produces a verdict with reasons before a person looks
Reviewers arrive at a decision, not a pile of files
Real Ownership
Every stage has a named owner, and the agent runs as that owner with their integrations
Decisions stay accountable to a person
Actionable Denials
A return carries a numbered checklist of required changes
Submitters know exactly what to fix
Resume, Don't Restart
A revision re-enters at the stage that returned it
No re-approving the stages that already passed
Apply Changes
Darcy can work the required changes itself, edit the scope of work, and resubmit
The mechanical half of a revision stops costing anyone a day
Private Reviewer Guidance
Requirements are public to submitters; extra agent guidance is not
Reviewers can steer the agent without coaching the submitter
Documents as Output
A stage can be configured to produce files — a memo, a redline, a filled-in checklist
Review chains that generate the artifact, not just an answer
Context That Travels
Submissions can carry files, meetings, and scopes of work, re-read from the source before each review
Reviewers judge the scope as it stands today, not a stale copy
Completion Summary
An approved item gets a written account of the whole run
The record is readable months later
Full Visibility
A board per pipeline, a personal queue, an event timeline, and agent transcripts for reviewers
Nothing is stuck without someone knowing
How Pipelines Work
A resubmission re-enters at the stage that returned it, so the approvals already given stand.
Build
A pipeline owner creates the pipeline and adds a stage per reviewer, each with requirements, an owner, and an agent
Publish
The pipeline goes from draft to active and starts accepting submissions
Submit
Someone submits an item — a title, a summary, and up to 10 files — and the first stage's review starts immediately
Review
The stage's agent reads the requirements and the files, then approves or denies with reasons and a list of required changes
Decide
The stage owner confirms the agent's recommendation or overrides it — or, in Agent decides mode, the verdict stands on its own
Revise
A returned item goes back to the submitter, who works the checklist and resubmits to the same stage
Complete
Once the last stage approves, the item is approved, deliverables from every stage are gathered, and a completion summary is written
Item Statuses
In review
A stage's agent is working
Nobody — wait
Awaiting owner
The agent has answered; the verdict needs confirming
The stage owner
Returned
A stage denied it; required changes are listed
The submitter
Approved
It cleared every stage
Done
Cancelled
Withdrawn by the submitter or the pipeline owner
Nobody
Pipelines vs. Workflows
Pipelines and Workflows both put agents to work, but they answer different questions:
Question answered
"Produce this for me"
"Is this good enough to pass?"
Shape
Tasks executed by one or more agents
Ordered stages, each with a human owner
Who is involved
The person who runs it
A submitter and one reviewer per stage
Outcome
A generated deliverable
A decision — approved, or returned with changes
Human role
Reviews the result at the end
Owns a gate in the middle
Use a workflow to create something. Use a pipeline to approve something — including something a workflow created.
Who Can Do What
Pipeline owner
Create and edit the pipeline, add/reorder/delete stages, reassign stage owners, publish, archive, delete, share — and override any stage's decision
Stage owner
Configure their own stage (requirements, agent, guidance, decision mode, outputs) and decide on items at it
Additional approver
Decide on items at a stage they don't own, and see the pipeline — without configuring the stage or running its agent
Submitter
Submit items, work the findings checklist, resubmit, cancel their own item
Shared viewer
See the pipeline and its items without deciding on them
Stage owners can configure their own stage without holding edit rights on the whole pipeline. Only the pipeline owner can hand a stage to someone else.
Getting Started
Open Pipelines Go to Build → Pipelines. The home page shows your personal queue, a place to submit, and every pipeline you can see.
Create a pipeline Give it a name, a description, and intake instructions telling submitters what to include. It starts as a draft and accepts nothing yet. See Building a Pipeline.
Add a stage per reviewer Each stage needs a name, an owner, an agent, and requirements — the bar a submission has to clear. Requirements are shown to submitters before they submit.
Publish Publishing turns the pipeline active. If a stage is missing an owner or an agent, publishing tells you exactly which one.
Submit the first item Use Submit item on the pipeline. The first stage's agent starts reviewing straight away. See Submitting & Revising Items.
Work your queue Reviewers see what needs their decision on the Pipelines home page and get notified when an item reaches their stage. See Reviewing & Deciding.
Next Steps
Create a pipeline and configure its stages
Submit work and respond to a return
Work a review queue and make decisions
Get files out of a pipeline
Drive pipelines from chat, agents, or MCP
Configure the agents that do the reviewing
Generate documents instead of approving them
Last updated
Was this helpful?

