Building a Pipeline
Create a pipeline, configure each stage's owner, agent, requirements and outputs, then publish it to start accepting submissions
A pipeline is built once and used many times, so it's worth spending the time on the stages. Everything a reviewer's agent knows about its job comes from the stage you give it.
Creating the Pipeline
Click New pipeline From Build → Pipelines, create a pipeline. You need the pipeline-create permission for your organization.
Fill in the basics A Name (required), a Description of what this reviews and who it's for, and Intake instructions telling submitters what to include — "the signed LOE and the pricing sheet". Intake instructions are shown on the submission form.
Add your stages You land on the pipeline's board with the first stage's editor open. Add one stage per reviewer, in the order they should review.
Publish The pipeline is a draft until you publish it, and a draft accepts no submissions.
Configuring a Stage
Name (required)
Everyone
The gate, not the person — e.g. "Verify LOE"
Stage owner
Everyone
The person accountable for this gate. The agent runs as this user, with their integrations and credentials — not the submitter's
Additional approvers
Everyone
Other people who may make the decision at this stage, without owning it (see below)
Requirements
Submitters too
The bar a submission must clear. Shown to submitters before they submit, and given to the agent as the standard to judge against
Decision mode
—
Whether the owner confirms the verdict or the agent's verdict stands (see below)
When the submitter dismisses an ask
—
Whether a checklist cleared by dismissing asks waits for you to accept it (the default) or moves on by itself
Extra agent guidance
Reviewers only
Private steer for the agent — "reject scanned copies". Submitters never see this
Pass findings to later stages
Later stages' agents
Off by default. Hidden on the last stage, which has nowhere to forward to
Produces deliverables
—
The agent writes files as well as deciding
Writing Requirements That Work
Requirements do double duty: they're the checklist a submitter reads before submitting, and the standard the agent judges against. Write them as things that can pass or fail.
"Make sure the deal is sound"
"Term is 12, 24, or 36 months. Uplift is stated as a percentage. The pricing sheet totals match the LOE."
"Check the contract"
"Liability cap is present and no higher than 12 months of fees. The renewal clause states a notice period."
The stage's agent doesn't only see an excerpt — submitted files are placed on the agent's cloud computer, so it can open a document in full. That means requirements and guidance can tell it to go and look: "open the contract and check that clause 7 survives the renewal" is a reasonable instruction, and it works even on a scanned PDF or a spreadsheet that text extraction can't handle.
Decision Modes
Agent recommends, I decide (default)
The agent produces a verdict and the item waits on the stage owner to confirm or override it
The decision carries weight, or you're still learning to trust the agent at this stage
Agent decides
The agent's verdict moves the item on its own — approving it to the next stage, or returning it to the submitter
The check is mechanical and well specified, and you'd rather not be a bottleneck
In either mode the reasons, findings, and transcript are recorded, so an Agent decides stage is still fully auditable.
Sharing a Stage's Decision
A stage can name additional approvers alongside its owner — a second counsel who can sign off while the first is on leave, or a small team who share a queue. They're additive, not a replacement:
Makes the decision
Yes
Yes
The agent runs as them
Yes
No
Configures the stage
Yes
No
Notified when an item arrives
Yes
Yes
Can read the agent's transcript and notes
Yes
Yes
Sees the pipeline and its items
Yes
Yes — access comes with the assignment
Only the pipeline owner can change a stage's additional approvers, the same rule that governs reassigning the owner itself.
What a Stage Passes On
By default, a later stage sees only that an earlier one approved, plus its one-line reason.
Pass findings to later stages — later reviewers' agents also see this stage's agent notes and any files it produced, quoted inline where they're text. Turn it on when a later stage's job builds on an earlier one's: legal reads what finance actually verified rather than re-deriving it. Leave it off when stages should judge independently, so one reviewer's read doesn't bias the next. Forwarding reaches every later stage, and only applies to stages that approved.
Produces deliverables — the agent writes files as well as deciding. The switch doesn't say what to write: describe the artifact in Requirements or Extra agent guidance. "A one-page risk memo as
risk-memo.md, listing every exception you found" gets you a memo; "produce a memo" doesn't. See Deliverables & Completion.
Publishing, Archiving & Deleting
Publish
Pipeline owner
Draft → active. Refused while any stage is missing an owner or an agent, and it names the stages that need fixing
Archive
Pipeline owner
Active → archived. Intake closes; items already in flight keep moving to a verdict. Reversible — publish reopens it
Delete
Pipeline owner
Removes the pipeline and every item ever submitted to it. Available from the pipelines roster
Changing a Live Pipeline
Editing a published pipeline is allowed — reviewers tune their own requirements and guidance all the time — but structural changes are restricted:
Only the pipeline owner can reassign a stage owner, change its additional approvers, delete a stage, or reorder stages
A stage owner can configure their own stage without edit rights on the pipeline
Reordering and deleting are refused while items sit at the stages involved, because a moved stage would make an in-flight item skip or revisit a review. Resolve or cancel those items first
Reordering takes every stage into a new order, so the numbers you see on the board always match the order of review
Sharing & Access
Pipeline owner
The creator
Stage owners
Assigned to a stage — they see the pipeline and its items automatically
Additional approvers
Named on a stage — access comes with the assignment, same as an owner's
Submitters
Anyone who can see the pipeline can submit to it, and always sees their own items
Shared viewers
Added through Share on the pipeline, individually or via Groups
Use Share in the pipeline header to give someone visibility — a sales manager who wants to watch the deal desk queue without owning a stage.
Next Steps
Submit the first item
Work the review queue
Configure a stage that produces files
Build a pipeline by asking Darcy
Configure the reviewing agents
Manage access with groups
Last updated
Was this helpful?

