For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt. This page is also available as Markdown.

Building a Pipeline

Create a pipeline, configure each stage's owner, agent, requirements and outputs, then publish it to start accepting submissions

A pipeline is built once and used many times, so it's worth spending the time on the stages. Everything a reviewer's agent knows about its job comes from the stage you give it.

Creating the Pipeline

1

Click New pipeline From Build → Pipelines, create a pipeline. You need the pipeline-create permission for your organization.

2

Fill in the basics A Name (required), a Description of what this reviews and who it's for, and Intake instructions telling submitters what to include — "the signed LOE and the pricing sheet". Intake instructions are shown on the submission form.

3

Add your stages You land on the pipeline's board with the first stage's editor open. Add one stage per reviewer, in the order they should review.

4

Publish The pipeline is a draft until you publish it, and a draft accepts no submissions.

Configuring a Stage

Field
Who sees it
Notes

Name (required)

Everyone

The gate, not the person — e.g. "Verify LOE"

Stage owner

Everyone

The person accountable for this gate. The agent runs as this user, with their integrations and credentials — not the submitter's

Additional approvers

Everyone

Other people who may make the decision at this stage, without owning it (see below)

Requirements

Submitters too

The bar a submission must clear. Shown to submitters before they submit, and given to the agent as the standard to judge against

Decision mode

—

Whether the owner confirms the verdict or the agent's verdict stands (see below)

When the submitter dismisses an ask

—

Whether a checklist cleared by dismissing asks waits for you to accept it (the default) or moves on by itself

Agent

Everyone

Which agent reviews at this stage. Required before publishing

Extra agent guidance

Reviewers only

Private steer for the agent — "reject scanned copies". Submitters never see this

Pass findings to later stages

Later stages' agents

Off by default. Hidden on the last stage, which has nowhere to forward to

Produces deliverables

—

The agent writes files as well as deciding

Writing Requirements That Work

Requirements do double duty: they're the checklist a submitter reads before submitting, and the standard the agent judges against. Write them as things that can pass or fail.

Instead of
Write

"Make sure the deal is sound"

"Term is 12, 24, or 36 months. Uplift is stated as a percentage. The pricing sheet totals match the LOE."

"Check the contract"

"Liability cap is present and no higher than 12 months of fees. The renewal clause states a notice period."

The stage's agent doesn't only see an excerpt — submitted files are placed on the agent's cloud computer, so it can open a document in full. That means requirements and guidance can tell it to go and look: "open the contract and check that clause 7 survives the renewal" is a reasonable instruction, and it works even on a scanned PDF or a spreadsheet that text extraction can't handle.

Decision Modes

Mode
Behavior
Use when

Agent recommends, I decide (default)

The agent produces a verdict and the item waits on the stage owner to confirm or override it

The decision carries weight, or you're still learning to trust the agent at this stage

Agent decides

The agent's verdict moves the item on its own — approving it to the next stage, or returning it to the submitter

The check is mechanical and well specified, and you'd rather not be a bottleneck

In either mode the reasons, findings, and transcript are recorded, so an Agent decides stage is still fully auditable.

Sharing a Stage's Decision

A stage can name additional approvers alongside its owner — a second counsel who can sign off while the first is on leave, or a small team who share a queue. They're additive, not a replacement:

Stage owner
Additional approver

Makes the decision

Yes

Yes

The agent runs as them

Yes

No

Configures the stage

Yes

No

Notified when an item arrives

Yes

Yes

Can read the agent's transcript and notes

Yes

Yes

Sees the pipeline and its items

Yes

Yes — access comes with the assignment

Only the pipeline owner can change a stage's additional approvers, the same rule that governs reassigning the owner itself.

Additional approvers are set through Darcy or the API, not the stage editor. The stage panel covers the owner; ask Darcy to add approvers to a stage, or use the API. See Pipelines with Darcy.

What a Stage Passes On

By default, a later stage sees only that an earlier one approved, plus its one-line reason.

  • Pass findings to later stages — later reviewers' agents also see this stage's agent notes and any files it produced, quoted inline where they're text. Turn it on when a later stage's job builds on an earlier one's: legal reads what finance actually verified rather than re-deriving it. Leave it off when stages should judge independently, so one reviewer's read doesn't bias the next. Forwarding reaches every later stage, and only applies to stages that approved.

  • Produces deliverables — the agent writes files as well as deciding. The switch doesn't say what to write: describe the artifact in Requirements or Extra agent guidance. "A one-page risk memo as risk-memo.md, listing every exception you found" gets you a memo; "produce a memo" doesn't. See Deliverables & Completion.

Publishing, Archiving & Deleting

Action
Who
Effect

Publish

Pipeline owner

Draft → active. Refused while any stage is missing an owner or an agent, and it names the stages that need fixing

Archive

Pipeline owner

Active → archived. Intake closes; items already in flight keep moving to a verdict. Reversible — publish reopens it

Delete

Pipeline owner

Removes the pipeline and every item ever submitted to it. Available from the pipelines roster

Changing a Live Pipeline

Editing a published pipeline is allowed — reviewers tune their own requirements and guidance all the time — but structural changes are restricted:

  • Only the pipeline owner can reassign a stage owner, change its additional approvers, delete a stage, or reorder stages

  • A stage owner can configure their own stage without edit rights on the pipeline

  • Reordering and deleting are refused while items sit at the stages involved, because a moved stage would make an in-flight item skip or revisit a review. Resolve or cancel those items first

  • Reordering takes every stage into a new order, so the numbers you see on the board always match the order of review

An item stuck at a stage is not a structure problem. Reordering won't unstick it — the fix is a decision at that stage, or a re-run if the agent errored. See Reviewing & Deciding.

Sharing & Access

Who
How they get access

Pipeline owner

The creator

Stage owners

Assigned to a stage — they see the pipeline and its items automatically

Additional approvers

Named on a stage — access comes with the assignment, same as an owner's

Submitters

Anyone who can see the pipeline can submit to it, and always sees their own items

Shared viewers

Added through Share on the pipeline, individually or via Groups

Use Share in the pipeline header to give someone visibility — a sales manager who wants to watch the deal desk queue without owning a stage.

Next Steps

Goal
Documentation

Submit the first item

Work the review queue

Configure a stage that produces files

Build a pipeline by asking Darcy

Configure the reviewing agents

Manage access with groups

Last updated

Was this helpful?