For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt. This page is also available as Markdown.

Reviewing & Deciding

Work your review queue, read what your agent found, and approve or return an item with the changes you need

If you own a stage, the work comes to you already read. Your agent has been through the submission against your requirements and produced a verdict, reasons, and a list of what it thinks is wrong. Your job is the decision.

Your Queue

The Pipelines home page opens on your own queue, split by what each group needs from you:

Section
What's in it

Needs your decision

Items where the agent has answered and is waiting on you

Returned to you

Your own submissions that a stage sent back

Running at your stages

Items whose review is still in progress — nothing to do yet

"Your stages" means every stage you own or are an additional approver on.

You're also notified when work reaches you, so the queue is a place to work rather than a place to check.

The Board

Each pipeline has a Board tab with a column per stage, in review order, plus a Done column. A card sits in the column of the stage currently holding it, so the shape of the queue is the shape of the backlog.

Control
Options

Filter

All items · Submitted by me · Needs you

Sort

Longest waiting · Recently updated · Newest · Oldest

Items tab

The same submissions as a searchable, filterable list rather than a board

Longest waiting is the one to sort by when you're catching up — it surfaces what's been sitting rather than what's newest.

Reading a Review

Open an item to get the Review, Files, and Activity tabs. The Review tab carries, for the current stage:

Element
What it tells you

Agent decision

Approve or deny, as the agent judged it

Agent reason

Why, in a line or two

Required changes

The specific findings behind a denial, numbered — with how many the submitter has resolved, and any they dismissed as not applicable

Agent notes

The agent's private aside to you. Reviewers only; never shown to the submitter

Deliverables

Any files the stage produced, if it's configured to produce them

Agent transcript

The agent's full message history, for when a verdict needs explaining

The transcript is reviewers-only. It opens with the prompt, which quotes your stage's private guidance — so it's restricted to the pipeline owner and stage owners, the same audience as the agent's raw output.

Earlier stages' reviews stay on the item, so you can see what's already been checked before you add your own view. If an earlier stage has Pass findings to later stages switched on, your agent was also given that stage's notes and files.

Your agent is also handed whatever context came with the submission — the files, and any meetings or scopes of work the submitter attached — each under its own heading and labelled with the revision it arrived in, so new context is distinguishable from what you've already seen. Meetings and scopes are re-read from their source before the run, and one that has moved since it was attached says so in the label. See Submitting & Revising Items.

When an Item Comes Back

A resubmitted item isn't reviewed from scratch. Your agent is handed the changes it asked for last time and answers each one — made, or not made — and the outcome follows from those answers rather than from a fresh opinion:

  • Every change was made → the item passes your stage. The agent doesn't get to deny on a new concern it thought of this round.

  • Any change wasn't made → the item goes back for exactly those changes, worded as you first asked for them. Nothing new is added to the list.

The Review tab shows each change with a tick or a cross and the agent's own words about it, so a submitter can see what was accepted and what still isn't.

Why re-reviews are narrowed. Review is open-ended by nature, and an agent asked "is this good?" a second time will usually find something else to want. Without this, a submitter who did everything asked of them gets a new list instead of a decision. Anything the agent notices but didn't ask for lands in Agent notes for you — you can act on it with your own authority, which is the part a submitter can't argue with.

After three rounds the item comes to you. If a stage has sent the same item back three times, the fourth denial lands as Awaiting owner instead, with what the agent wanted still attached. At that point it's a disagreement rather than a review, and it needs a person to settle it.

Moving a Returned Item On Yourself

A returned item sits with its submitter, which means a stage can stall over a change that turned out not to matter. As the stage's owner or delegated approver you can move it on without waiting: open the item and use Move to <next stage> in the "You approve this stage" bar under the tabs. You're asked for a reason, which the submitter and the next stage both see.

This is the same authority you already have to approve an item waiting on you, applied to one you've sent back. The returning review is left as it stands — it did deny the item, and the timeline records that you overrode it.

Submitters can dismiss changes. Alongside ticking changes off, a submitter can mark one Doesn't apply. A dismissed change stays on the checklist struck through, with who dismissed it and why. What happens when the list is cleared that way is a stage setting, When the submitter dismisses an ask:

  • I approve dismissals (the default) — the item comes to you as Awaiting owner with the dismissed rows in front of you. Approve accepts them and moves the item on. Return with feedback reopens the dismissed changes, and the reason is pre-filled with them.

  • Move on automatically — the item goes to the next stage as soon as nothing is left open.

Dismissals by you, a delegate, or the pipeline owner never wait for approval, since any of you could move the item on directly.

Making the Decision

In Agent recommends, I decide mode the item waits on you as Awaiting owner:

  • Approve — the item moves to the next stage, or is approved outright if yours is the last

  • Return with feedback — the item goes back to the submitter with your reason. The reason is pre-filled from the findings that are still open, so you can send it as-is or say it your own way

Whatever you write is stored as the decision reason and is read back to the agent on the next attempt, so the findings reach it verbatim.

In Agent decides mode the verdict moves the item on its own and you'll see it as already decided. You still get the full record, and as a stage owner you can change the mode at any time.

When a Stage Has More Than One Approver

A stage can name additional approvers beside its owner. Any of them can make the decision, and all of them are notified when an item arrives — so a stage doesn't stall because one person is away. Items at those stages appear in your Needs your decision queue exactly as they would for an owner. The agent still runs as the stage owner, with the owner's integrations, whoever ends up deciding. See Building a Pipeline.

When the Agent Errors

If a review fails — a tool was unavailable, the agent hit an error — the item still lands on you rather than disappearing, and the failure is shown for what it is. Use Re-run the agent to try again. Re-running is also available while a review is queued or still running, for a review that's clearly gone astray.

Each attempt is kept, so the record of what the agent said and when it broke stays intact.

Notifications

Event
Who is notified

An item arrives at a stage

That stage's owner

An item is resubmitted to a stage

That stage's owner

A decision is needed

The stage owner, once the agent has answered (or errored)

An item is returned

The submitter, with the required changes

An item is approved

The submitter

A returned-item notification carries the reviewer's reason and the required changes, so the submitter can start work from the email itself. Every notification links straight to the item.

Delivery is controlled per person under Pipeline activity in your notification settings, with Email and Push as separate switches. See User Configuration.

A Few Habits That Help

Practice
Why

Put the bar in Requirements, the nuance in guidance

Submitters can act on requirements; guidance is where you tell the agent what you don't want to say out loud

Start in "Agent recommends, I decide"

Watch a handful of verdicts at your stage before letting the agent decide alone

Fix the stage, not the item

A finding the agent keeps missing is a requirements problem — edit the stage and it applies to every future submission

Read the findings before the reason

The numbered findings are what the submitter will actually work from

Sort by Longest waiting

The item that's been sitting is usually the one costing someone else time

Next Steps

Goal
Documentation

Change what your stage asks for

See what the submitter sees

Have your stage produce a document

Ask Darcy where an item stands

Tune the agent doing your reviewing

Last updated

Was this helpful?